Inspired by the BBC’s latest rendition of the Sherlock Holmes series, I have been indulging in some of the older versions. Over the past two weeks, I’ve revelled in Jeremy Brett’s version of the world’s only consulting detective.
After four or five episodes of the series starring Brett, I have come to the conclusion that Sherlock Holmes was not so interested in justice as something metered by out the state, but rather seemed to be satisfied with securing justice as delivered by fate, so to speak. (My evidence: The Master Blackmailer)
Moreover, Mr. Holmes was not so big on the preservation of evidence for criminal trial. As long as he understood and fit a particular piece of evidence in his theory, then he was happy for the evidence to be discarded. (My evidence: Sign of the Four)
No wonder not all of the local police were big fans of his!
It’s funny how synonymous certain actors and actresses can become with certain roles.
I cannot see anyone other than Brett as Sherlock Holmes. Not unlike Leo McKern as Rumpole or Helen Mirren as DCI Tennison.
Not exactly related to your post, but it got me to thinking of such.
And what of Basil Rathbone?
You can’t beat Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce!
Basil Rathbone couldn’t sleuth his way out of a wet paper bag.
Jeremy Brett as Sherlock forever!
@ Forkboy,
Liar! Basil Rathbone would open up a can sleuthiness all over your non-detecting self! Ok, he lacked the moodiness, tempestuousness and audacity of Brett, but still, a solid Sherlock Holmes indeed.
@ Forkboy,
Liar is such a harsh word. I take that back. Not sure what overcame me to exhibit such rudeness.
But I do stand by the value of Rathbone as Mr. Holmes.